Skip to main content

Step up with active ownership

You’re saving in a Pension, Stocks and Shares ISA or Unit Trust / Investment Account that invests your money in our funds. Some of our funds directly invest in bonds and shares your behalf. Some of our funds invest in a collection of other funds - our funds that do that are known as funds of funds.

Owning shares means being a shareholder and getting the opportunity to influence the companies invested in, by voting on what the company does. For both shares and bonds, there is the opportunity to influence companies by engaging with them on important issues. For our directly invested funds our expert Investment Adviser abrdn Link opens in a new window votes and engages with companies. In our funds of funds, both voting, and engagement is carried out by the Fund Manager of the fund we invest in.

Being an active owner means making sure the voice your money has is being used to influence companies with the aim to make sure they put your money to good use. This means considering more than just the financial performance of the company – it’s also about considering the affect they have on the world and working to make it positive. More and more, it means looking at the company’s plans for the future to consider whether these are good for people and the planet.

We are moving to investing responsibly across all of our funds. This is shifting our investments from just following different stock market indices, where we don’t pick and choose the companies we invest in, to considering people and the planet in the way they are using your money to grow. An important part of this is using the voice your money has through active ownership; we need to make sure the experts we work with such as our Investment Adviser abrdn and other Fund Managers are engaging with companies on the most important issues and – if investing in shares – using voting rights to work towards positive change.

Our Investment Adviser abrdn has a policy which sets out their approach to active ownership and the issues they seek to influence companies on. Check it out here.to read the policy Link opens in a new window

Engage towards positive change

Our funds invest in a lot of companies, so they need to engage on the most important issues and the companies that need to change the most to move towards being positive in their impact.

Funds Managers will have processes in place to work with companies and use common goals with other investors to try to progress important issues for everyone – like human rights and reducing carbon emissions.

Votes matter

For the funds that invest directly in shares, these come with a right to vote in the decisions companies make in their annual general meeting. Fund Managers will have an approach to voting and this includes using that power along with investor engagement to raise issues they believe are important with companies, as well as raising objections on decisions they disagree with.

For the two Virgin Money funds that invest directly in shares, the tables below show part of our voting record during 2023. It lists, for the ten largest holdings in each fund, the votes made by our Investment Adviser abrdn on our behalf that differed from the recommendation of the company.

PositionCompanyMatter voted onVote direction recommended by CompanyVote direction takenReason
1GSK PlcApprove Remuneration Report and PolicyForAgainstOur long standing concerns about high levels of vesting for achieving only threshold or median performance in the long term incentive scheme were not addressed by the new remuneration policy. In addition, we were concerned by the significant increase in bonus maximum from 200 percent to 300 percent of salary.
2Glencore PlcApprove Climate Progress ReportForAgainstWe have had positive ongoing engagement with Glencore on its climate approach and note improved transparency on its targets and strategy. However, improvement is still needed to increase the robustness of climate linked renumeration and the clarity of targets for the depletion of the company’s thermal coal assets. We recognise that the company has undergone a transition period in relation to its Board, executive team and senior management and believe that it is now well positioned to oversee more robust measures.
3Rio Tinto plcAccept Financial Statements and Statutory ReportsForAbstainWe are supportive of the work that the company has undertaken in both issuing the Broderick Report, facilitating engagement with its executive team & Chair, and the action plan put in place to address these areas in the report. However, in light of the severity and nature of the report’s findings, we believe that it would not be reflective of our clients’ interests to support the financial statements and statutory reports. On this basis we abstained on this resolution.
4RELX PlcApprove Remuneration ReportForAgainstThe long term incentive scheme the company uses allows a high level of vesting for achieving only median performance.
5Reckitt Benckiser Group PlcApprove Remuneration Report and PolicyForAgainstWe have had long standing concerns about the high quantum of the Long Term Incentive Policy (LTIP) and its overall structure.
6Compass Group PlcApprove Remuneration PolicyForAgainstWe felt that a vote against the remuneration policy is warranted. The maximum opportunity under the LTIP will be increased from 300 percent to 400 percent of salary for the CEO, and from 250 percent to 350 percent of salary for the other Executive Directors. The company's rationale is not considered sufficiently compelling to justify the significant increases.
7Ashtead Group plcApprove Remuneration ReportForAgainstWe voted against relevant remuneration related resolutions last year due to the introduction of a one-off additional LTIP award of 350 percent of salary. On this basis it was logical to vote against this resolution this year. We were also aware that despite receiving high levels of dissent on the resolutions last year the company made no material changes to its approach.
8SSE PlcApprove Remuneration PolicyForAgainstThe company consulted with us earlier in the year on increasing the annual grant size of its long term incentive scheme from 200 percent of salary to 250 percent of salary. Our view was that this was not an appropriate time to make such an increase in the context of the cost of living crisis which was already developing.
9NatWest Group PlcRe-election of a DirectorForAgainstWe voted against as we have concerns regarding the number of board mandates held by this director.
10InterContinental Hotels Group PlcApprove Remuneration ReportForAgainstWe voted against a number of remuneration related resolutions last year and the year before. It seemed logical that we should vote against this resolution this year as one incumbent executive still receives a pension contribution rate that is not aligned with the broader workforce.

PositionCompanyMatter voted onVote direction recommended by CompanyVote direction takenReason
1Apple IncShareholder Proposal Regarding App RemovalsAgainstForWe voted in favour of this shareholder proposal as we supported greater transparency from the company regarding the removal of apps from the Apple Store
  Shareholder Proposal Regarding Report on Effectiveness of Supply Chain Policies on Forced LabourAgainstForWe voted in favour of this shareholder proposal as we support improved human/political rights policies/disclosure.
  Shareholder Proposal Regarding Median Gender and Racial Pay Equity ReportAgainstForEnhanced disclosure would allow shareholders a better understanding of how the issue of pay equity was being managed and overseen.
  Shareholder Proposal Regarding Civil Rights AuditAgainstForWe voted in favour of this shareholder proposal as we support a third-party civil-rights audit of the company’s commitments to equality and fairness.
  Shareholder Proposal Regarding Concealment ClausesAgainstForWe voted in favour of this shareholder proposal as better disclosure will help shareholders assess the risks involved in the company's use of concealment clauses.
2TotalEnergiesRe-election of DirectorForAgainstWe voted against as we feel that there has been a failure to adopt a science-based Greenhouse Gas emissions reduction target.
3Reckitt Benckiser Group PlcRemuneration ReportForAgainstWe voted against this item as the company has failed to incentivise mitigation of material Environmental & Social risks.
4Essilorluxottica2021 Remuneration of CEO and Deputy CEO & 2022 Remuneration Policy (CEO & Deputy CEO)ForAgainstWe voted against as we feel that compensation packages are excessive and there has been insufficient response to shareholder dissent.
5UBS GroupAppointment of AuditorAgainstForWe have concerns regarding the length of auditor tenure, which could impede independence.
6GrifolsAppointment of AuditorForAgainstWe have concerns regarding the length of auditor tenure, which could impede independence.
 Remuneration ReportForAgainstWe voted against this item as the company has failed to incentivise mitigation of material Environmental & Social risks.
 Authority to Set Extraordinary General Meeting Notice Period at 15 daysForAgainstWe voted against this item as we believe that a shortened notice period could disenfranchise shareholders
7Microsoft CorporationAdvisory Vote to Ratify Named Executive Officers' CompensationForAgainstWe have concerns regarding the link between pay and performance. Time-based awards to any one individual are worth $5m or more in the preceding year. Performance-based awards have a performance period of less than three years.
 Appointment of AuditorForAgainstWe have concerns regarding the length of auditor tenure, which could impede independence.
 Report on Tax TransparencyAgainstForWe voted in favour of this shareholder proposal as we support greater transparency on tax from the companies in which we invest. Tax transparency can illuminate material risks to profitability and reputation. Microsoft’s business lines and global operations leave it exposed to tax reform and the requested report would support the Company to adopt disclosures that keep it ahead of the regulatory curve.
8International Flavours and FragrancesElection of named DirectorForAgainstWe voted against as we felt that this director already serves on too many boards.
 Appointment of AuditorForAgainstWe have concerns regarding the length of auditor tenure, which could impede independence.
 Advisory Vote on Executive CompensationForAgainstWe voted against this item as the company has failed to incentivise mitigation of material Environmental & Social risks.
9Goodman GroupRe-elect named Director of Goodman LimitedForAgainstWe voted against this re-election as the director is already an executive director (CEO America) and thus not independent. We have engaged with the company about this since last year’s vote and whilst we recognise that this was legacy driven rather than intentional, we are of the view that at some point this needs to change. We think increasing the level of independence on the board is ultimately more beneficial to shareholders now than having additional executives on the board.
 Approve Remuneration ReportForAgainstWe abstained on the Remuneration Report last year on balance given the solid alignment of the remuneration framework but with reservations given the quantum of performance rights. We did raise this in subsequent engagement and whilst we have indeed seen improvement this year, the company appears to continue to adopt an economic value calculation to determine the quantum of rights. We are of the view that the total remuneration package remains excessive for a property business that is arguably less complex to operate and to risk manage when compared to other global businesses.
 Approve Issuance of Performance Rights to named DirectorsForAgainstWe voted against as the quantum of rights granted is considered excessive given it is calculated based on an economic value being substantially below fair value.
 Approve the Increase in Non-Executive Directors' Fee PoolForAgainstThe rationale for increase is sound and we do agree that an increase is needed however the 60% increase appears too much without a further breakdown of fees.
10Vivendi2021 Remuneration ReportForAgainstWe voted against this as we believe there had been a poor response to shareholder dissent.
 2021 Remuneration of Board membersForAgainstWe felt that there was a poor overall design, increase was excessive and there had been poor response to shareholder dissent
 2021 Remuneration of Management Board ChairForAgainstWe did not agree that Non-executive participation should be linked to performance; in addition, there was a poor response to shareholder dissent.
 2022 Remuneration Policy (Supervisory Board)ForAgainstWe did not agree that Non-executive participation should be linked to performance; in addition, there was a poor response to shareholder dissent.
 Authorise Public Share Buyback OfferForAgainstWe voted against as we did not believe that this proposal was in shareholders’ best interests.

A few more important things

There are a few other areas of active ownership that are considered and these help us to manage your investments.

Conflicts of interest based on ownership influence

That means keeping an eye out for things that we and other Fund Managers do that might stop us from making the most of this on your behalf.

Sweating the big stuff

Our Investment Adviser abrdn and other Fund Managers work with other investors on the big things that companies need to do to build towards positive change and a brighter future.

Lending out

A couple of our funds can lend out their investments, which also includes ownership rights. We make sure this is only in small amounts, for a short time.